Elementary and Secondary School Counseling Program
The purpose of the Elementary and
Secondary School Counseling Program is to support efforts by local educational agencies (LEAs) to establish or expand elementary school and secondary
school counseling programs. The only absolute priority is to establish or expand counseling programs in elementary schools, secondary schools or both.
Please request an application for more information.
Award Information
Type of Award: DISCRETIONARY grants. Estimated Range of Awards:
$250,000-$400,000. Estimated Average Size of Awards: $350,000. Number of Awards: 50.
Deadlines and Contact Information
Application Deadline: January 28, 2008. To obtain a copy via
internet, use the following address: http://www.ed.gov/programs/elsecounseling/applicant.html. You may also contact the ED Pubs Toll Free
number at 1-877-433-7827 and ask for CFDA number 84.215E. For further information contact: Loretta McDaniel, US Dept. of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW Room 3E214, Washington DC 20202-6450. Telephone 202-260-2661 or by e-mail at Loretta.McDaniel@ed.gov.
CERTIFICATION
State-approved Workshops in Child Abuse Identification and Violence Prevention
The
New York State Education Department requires completion of two state-approved workshops as part of the certification process.
-
Those teachers who are applying for a NYS teaching certification via transcript evaluation or reciprocity
must complete this requirement on their own.
-
Those who are being recommended for certification based on an undergraduate degree complete the workshops
as part of the teacher preparatory program.
-
Those who are being recommended for certification via a Trans B program or a graduate level teacher
preparatory program should check with their college/university to determine if they need to do this on their own or if it is included in the
collegiate program.
The following two companies are NYS approved providers who offer these workshops on-line
for a fee. Please make sure that your teachers request a hard copy of a Certificate of Completion for each workshop which they then must mail
to the NYS Education Department, Office of Teaching, 89 Washington Avenue, Room 5N-EB, Albany NY 12234. They should also provide a copy to the school
for their personnel file and keep one for their home file.
1. www.laboratoryconsultationservices.com -$30 fee per workshop
2. www.childabuseworkshop.com - $39.95 for one workshop and a $15 discount if taken along with the
Violence Prevention workshop.
3. www.violenceworkshop.com -$39.95 for one workshop and a $15 discount if taken along with the Child Abuse Identification
workshop.
Teacher Certification Workshops for Current and Prospective Teachers and Teaching Assistants on Tuesday,
January 15th and Wednesday, January 23rd from 4:30pm – 8:30pm
To assist charter schools in meeting compliance with state and
federal laws regarding certification, the Charter Center announces the first of the 2008 Teacher Certification Workshop Series. Inasmuch as the
January workshops will be held after school, there will be two workshops in a shorter time frame than the traditional Saturday/Sunday workshop.
The available times slots will be from 4:30pm – 8:30pm on both January 15th and January 23rd.
Current and prospective
uncertified teachers and teacher assistants, as well as teachers from out-of-state who need assistance with the New York State certification process,
are encouraged to register for one of these workshops. The workshops will take place at the NYC Center for Charter School Excellence.
-
All workshop participants must show a photo ID to gain building access.
-
All participants must bring student copies of complete undergraduate (and graduate) transcripts and
any other related documents, such as proof of the Child Abuse Identification and Violence Prevention workshops, previous State Ed evaluations, etc.
-
Those who possess certification from another state need to bring a copy of their college transcripts in addition to a copy of their
out-of-state certificate.
-
Each participant will be pre-assigned a specific 45 minute time slot between 4:30pm and 8:00pm to meet individually with a
certification specialist who will recommend a personalized education plan leading to certification. A hard copy of this plan will be given to the
participant who is advised to share with his/her school leader.
-
A list of participants from each school will be provided to the school leader for appropriate follow-up to ensure compliance with
state and federal laws.
-
Refreshments will be available
Please share this announcement with current and prospective hires and advise them that they need to register in
advance by emailing Caryl Cohen no later than January 11th for the
January 15th workshop and January 21st for the January 23rd workshop. They will then
be emailed an invitation with the allocated time slot. They must include the name of their charter school in the email. All questions should be
directed to Caryl Cohen at the above email address.
CENTER RESOURCES
CHARTER PORTAL
The
Charter Portal is an online data management system designed for charter school leaders. Sign in to the Portal for access to these features [link
“these features” to “NYC CCSE Charter Portal Instructions.doc”] and more!
To access the Portal:
1. Using Internet Explorer, go to our Website and click the green box in the upper left corner called “Attention All School Leaders”.
2. Click “Log in Here” and enter your school’s user name and password. If you do not know your user name or password,
please contact Nathan Hood.
3. Once inside, right click on the main screen, select
“Create Shortcut”, then select “Yes”. This adds a link to the Portal to your desktop for easy access in the future.
One feature of the Portal is the Documents Library, a growing list of informative documents that covers everything from governance and
fundraising to operations and teacher certification. Log on to the Portal to view the following new additions to the Library:
Campus Management Memo
from NYC Department of Education (DOE)
Financial Oversight Handbook
from Charter School Institute, The State University of New York (SUNY)
The following documents are from the Charter School Admissions and Lottery Workshop on December 4. Check out our events calendar for upcoming
workshops!
Admissions FAQ
from NYC Center for Charter School Excellence
Guidance on Lottery Dates and Admissions Preferences
from Charter School Institute, The State University of New York (SUNY)
Guidance on Student Recruitment
from Charter School Institute, The State University of New York (SUNY)
THE CENTERPIECE
“PROGRESS” ON PROGRESS REPORTS
As those of you who are with
schools authorized by the Department of Education now know, after much back and forth, the Department has decided that it will issue progress reports
publicly together with grades. These reports and grades will come out this week.
As I had indicated at a meeting of the charter coalition two weeks ago, the Center
is opposed to grades being issued this year—though not to charter schools getting grades—for two reasons.
First, charter schools had either not been given the opportunity to administer
“learning environment” surveys to parents and staff, or if they had, DoE hadn’t compiled that information in such a way to make
it usable. The results from those surveys make up 10 percent of the grade in the formula that DoE uses to grade the district
schools; given charter schools’ popularity with parents, the data from those surveys (if they existed) would likely be favorable to charter
schools. Not having that data in hand, DoE proposed changing the formula to weight the two state test-based components more
heavily.[1] It seemed to us that
this was unacceptable on general principles but even more so when the grades are, at their heart, a comparative measure meant to give parents and
others an apples-to-apples measure by which they could judge schools’ performance.
Second, we opposed issuing grades this year because the Department had begun this
exercise earlier this year indicating that it would not grade schools this year—or even make progress reports public.
Switching course mid-stream did not and does not seem fair.
The Center made its opposition known to the Office of Charter Schools, the
Office of Portfolio Development and to the Chancellor personally. We had frank and candid exchanges of views (as the diplomats say) and I know that
our arguments were considered carefully. In the end, however, the decision was made not just by the Chancellor but at the highest
level of the municipal governmental food chain. So, despite our efforts, some charters will receive grades this year.
This is not to say that taking on this issue was entirely in vain.
Due to our arguments (and similar arguments made by some individual schools) the formula has changed and, it appears, for the better. Now, 15
percent of the grade will be based on a school’s attendance rates; we understand that the net result of this change was that two
schools’ grades improved and none was reduced. Of course, charter schools, and the public, will never know whether the scenario would have
been even more favorable if survey data had been generated and used in the same way it was for district schools. We suppose
theoretically, but sincerely doubt it, that it could have been worse. And we must still contend with the inevitable disclaimer
that the grades are not comparable, which begs the question of what the exercise is about.
Whatever our disappointment at the outcome (and of little comfort to those schools
that oppose issuance), the fact is that the overall picture for charters is enormously favorable and yet another indicator of charter school success
here in New York. When the grades come out it will be clear that the percentage of charters that received A’s
and B’s far exceeds the comparable percentages for district schools. We should celebrate that fact loudly
given that the press will take note of it.
The question now becomes how best to move forward.
Clearly, the grading system has its flaws, those generally, and those that may be of particular issue to charter schools. It has, in the last
two weeks, come in for quite a lambasting, (please click here to read articles on progress reports). Clearly as well, the
Department has indicated publicly a willingness to reassess both the formula it uses and the process it employs in gathering data. There is even a
hint that grades might be multiple.
Charter schools should have an active voice in seeing that the grades are done
right. At the same time we must ensure that if district schools are graded, charters should, at the very least, have an opportunity to get graded
too, using the same standards, the same data and the same process. Over the next month, the Center will be looking to establish a
working group made up of charter schools and experts, who can help us make our arguments. The alternative to engagement and active
involvement is a system in which charters will be perceived as the accountability movement that eschews accountability. That the movement can ill
afford.
*
* *
As we close out 2007, we continue to see signs of opposition around us.
Charter applicants continue to be asked to jump through ever more hoops, most of which have little to do with determining capacity—and many of
which appear designed to shove them into the same box in which district schools are stuck. Schools are often over monitored by too
many entities; and upstate, districts continue to blame us for the woes that preceded charters and that would succeed them if charters went
away.
Still something has shifted in this state from 1998 to 2007.
Charters are more and more accepted as having a place at the table—if only the one for kids (which seems oddly
appropriate). We have gone from a movement in which people thought they could make us disappear, to one in which the efforts are
now more focused at taming us and containing us. Your unbelievable energy, talent and obstreperousness will make sure they do not
succeed.
With that happy thought in mind, we wish you a very restful holiday
break. See you in the New Year.
James Merriman
jmerriman@nycchartercenter.org
[1] The grades are a result of four measures: outcomes
from the learning environment surveys (10%); attendance (5%); percentage of students at proficient as compared to “peer” schools and
schools city-wide (30%); and aggregate improvement of cohorts as compared to “peer” schools and schools city-wide (55%).
NEW SCHOOLS
La Cima Charter School
La Cima Charter School, whose
charter application was officially approved last Friday by the State Board of Regents, will open next fall with 160 students in Kindergarten and
First Grade. The K-5 elementary school will grow to 480 students by year five and offer a rigorous, standards-based curriculum focused on high
academic achievement and English and Spanish literacy for all students.
SUNY Charter Schools Approved
In October, SUNY's Board
of Trustees voted to approve seven charter schools for New York City. They are: Harlem Success Academy Charter School 3, 4 and 5; Green DOT New York
Charter School; Achievement First Brownsville Charter School; Collegiate Charter School (Brooklyn) and Carl C. Icahn Charter School Far Rockaway
(Queens).
CURRENT EVENTS
Women Who Empower Through Education
The Center would like to
congratulate East New York Preparatory Charter School Executive Director Sheila Joseph for being the recipient of the Women Who Empower Through
Education Award. The Award, which comes with a $10,000 grant given by Maybelline New York, honors women who influence their
communities through educational initiatives.