In the year 1906 Italian born
economist Vilfredo Pareto made a very famous observation while studying the wealth and property distribution in Italy. What he found in his study by
applying a mathematical algorithm was that about eighty percent (80%) of the wealth was controlled by only twenty percent (20%) of the people. This
fact in itself was not a significant observation at the time but during the early nineteen thirties (1930’s) a management pioneer by the name
of Dr. Joseph Juran credited this finding as a significant principle and he surnamed it the “Pareto Principle.” Juran began to
apply and generalize this principle often referring to it as the “vital few or the 80/20 rule.”
Today a pareto chart is used to
graphically display data cause types from largest to smallest in a bar chart form. Using a the top twenty percent (20%) cause type application, one
can focus efforts toward eighty percent (80%) problem effect resolution by focusing on the first one (1), two (2), or three (3) bars that
usually make up twenty percent (20%) of the cause types.
Value Stream Mapping
Value Stream Mapping is probably the most widely utilized lean tool used to analyze business and production
systems. The Value Stream Mapping process begins by first establishing a scope in a business case scenario or by identifying a specific product family
in the case of a production system or factory example. Next, a “Current State Map” is drawn using a set of standard icons. The result is
a snap-shot in time of the process being mapped.
Value Stream Mapping is somewhat different than other types of process mapping in the
fact that both the steps or process flow are shown at the bottom of the map and the information that drives the steps are shown at the top of the map.
In addition, all the steps or processes are mapped with one key point in mind; the customer. Knowing and understanding who and exactly what the
customer expects is a key tenant in lean. Value Stream Mapping helps to formally clarify what the customers’ requirements are. More
importantly, the process and information flows that support that customer are identified. In lean, the organizational challenge is to identify the
true customer requirements and develop a process to do only that. This is the essence of lean and the premise that makes Value Stream Mapping a great
tool.
Applying the Pareto Principle to Value Stream
Mapping
The third step involved in Value Stream Mapping is called the “Future State
Map.” In this step a vision for the future of the value stream is determined. The goal is to improve by focusing on the correct improvement
projects that really make a difference and effect the total system lead time. It is in the Future State Mapping step that the pareto principle
can be applied. If truly eighty percent (80%) of the results can be driven by the correct twenty percent (20%) of the improvement
projects identified then, it is imperative that the correct projects are identified. The pareto principle will hold true in this
case if and only if the correct projects are identified and implemented.
Improvements for the future state are identified by systematically evaluating the
information flow and key process steps from the Current State Map. In a sense, the Current State Map is used as a launching pad for the Future State
Map. This process always begins at the customer and works in reverse order following the information flow back to the first step in
the process. As each step and the information flow is evaluated, brainstorming begins on what might be improved for the future. The value
stream lead time which is measured at the bottom of the Current State Map becomes the basis for prioritization of the projects and activities that
will be directed to improve the value stream.
The opportunities for improvement that are identified during the Future State
Mapping analysis are known as “Kaizen Bursts.” These kaizen bursts are best classified by type of activity that must be conducted
or completed in order to achieve the future state vision. Typically, those activities fall into one of three types of activities. First, there
are those activities that require a team in some type of dedicated focused workshop or what is commonly known as a “Kaizen Workshop”
These workshops are usually five (5) days in duration and the associates involved are one hundred percent (100%) dedicated to workshop related
activities. Second, there are those types of activities that require a focused team approach. In this type of activity, associates may
work on and off on a project for a specific amount of time. The associate carries on regular work duties but participates for periods of time with a
focused team on project work related to the Future State Map. Finally, there may be individual tasks identified. Individual tasks are
activities that do not require a group or a team approach. These tasks are assigned and can be completed quickly utilizing one
person.
How Does One Eat An Elephant?
The age old question of “How do you eat an elephant?” is very
applicable when it comes to implementing the future state map. One simply cannot eat an elephant all at once. It must be consumed one bite at a time.
The same is true with value stream mapping. There are usually many projects and activities that can be improved within a given value stream.
There can be so many items identified to improve that an organization can become consumed with activities to do. Without focus, Value
Stream Mapping will not just open up a can of “to do” but it may open up an entire case of it.
The pareto principle will keep the organization focused on the one bite at a time.
Not only will the one bite at a time but it is the correct bites first. In order to do this the correct twenty percent (20%) of the projects must be
identified. This is simply determined by relating the projects to the effect on the lead time as a basis for selection. In general this
will narrow down the projects greatly. The cream always rises to the top and the vital few are born.
Implementation
Value Stream Mapping is a great tool. It really helps the organization to see the
whole related to the customer. However, in the end it is just a tool. It is not lean in a bottle. The end result of the initial activity
is a vision for the future called the Future State Map and a plan to implement it. That is it. So, what should we say then?
“Go get busy and do it!”.