Forward this message to a friend
T.F.Wallace


Learn more about Tom, books, white papers and other resource material.

_______________

View archived newsletters

_____________ 

 

Upcoming Events

_____________ 

 

WORDS FROM WALLACE - June/July 2007
 
 

 
  DO YOU GET "SURPRISES?"

Risk is an important topic in business today, and supply chain management is right in the middle of discussions about risk. Potential disruptions - of moderate to major consequence - are more likely today than 20 or even ten years ago, for reasons that include supply chains lengthening and becoming less robust, natural disasters occurring at an increasing frequency, terrorism rising, and who knows what's coming next.
These factors can lead to significant disruptions of the demand/supply balance, and they often come with little or no warning. They're "surprises." And, actually, surprises can be not only bad surprises but also good ones - provided they're managed effectively.

Can Executive S&OP help with this? Well, it can't make the surprises go away but it can perhaps help you to either anticipate them a bit and/or  recover when they occur. For the time being, let's focus on recovery and see how an effective Executive S&OP process helps to deal with surprises of both the good and bad variety. First, the good:
 
Demand Spikes

One of your biggest customers - one of the "800 pound gorilla" variety - sends in a very large order, out of the blue, calling for three times more widgets than they've been taking in recent months. This may cause some problems, certainly, but on balance it's good news: they want to buy more of your product. How does a company deal with that? In other words, how does it recover?

Let's say that your monthly Executive S&OP cycle ended just a week before this very large order arrived. Well, you certainly can't afford to wait several weeks for the next planning cycle to address this problem. What do companies do in this situation?

Answer: they immediately conduct a "mini Executive S&OP cycle." This is an accelerated version of the standard 5-step Executive S&OP process shown in the diagram, dealing only with those parts of the business affected by the demand spike: the related materials, capacity, other resources, and perhaps other customers. Click here for more on the 5-step process.
 
The "Mini" Executive S&OP Cycle

They conduct, quickly, a Demand Planning step, a Supply Planning step, and hold an abbreviated Pre-Meeting and Exec Meeting if necessary. Decisions are made and the issue is resolved at the lowest level possible. If the folks in the Demand Planning step can solve the problem by shifting customer commitments around somewhat, fine. Case closed. Or perhaps the Supply Planning team can pull a rabbit out of the hat: excellent. Problem met and resolved.
 
But if not, the issue gets elevated to a mini Pre-Meeting for resolution and then to a mini Exec Meeting if the situation warrants. These meetings are typically much shorter than those in the monthly cycle; they focus on the issue at hand and related factors, with probably more than a few of the participants attending via telephone.
 
Throughout the abbreviated process, they try to keep the steps, the report formats, and the decision-making process the same as in the standard monthly cycle -- because the people are familiar with those processes and know they're solid. And of course the information is in dollars as well as units; the Finance folks are involved in this process, remember? The dollar view, obviously, is necessary to make decisions that are in the best financial interests of the company.
 
Thus there is a coordinated and rapid response to the demand spike. At worst, and hardly ever likely, the company may conclude that it can do nothing. Or perhaps it can supply some but not all of the order when the customer wants it, with the balance later. Or just maybe it can meet all of this customer's demand and still keep its commitments to the other customers, who may be only "600 pound gorillas," not 800 pounders.

A few years ago, I co-authored a book - ERP: Making It Happen - with Mike Kremzar, formerly Vice President of Product Supply at Procter & Gamble. Mike was the "force" behind the implementation of Executive S&OP at the company. He identified one of S&OP's big benefits as the creation of a common, agreed-upon game plan throughout each business.
 
This makes mid-period corrections, of the type we're talking about here, much easier than before. Mike indicated that they no longer had to spend the first X days debating whose numbers were right; there was only one set of numbers. They could get to work quickly, and develop the recovery plans.
 
Coming up next month: how to deal with "bad surprises" - supply crashes.

Thanks for listening,


Tom



Bullets from Bob Banner
When Is Learning Not Learning?

Learn more about

Bob Stahl 

_________

 


A question: if a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it, did it really make a noise?

 

A similar question about learning is: if someone learns something new, but does nothing differently as a result, did they learn anything at all?

I think the answer to both might be a big NO! 

 

Executive S&OP is a process that leads top management to better decisions with regard to balancing demand and supply. The process does this by taking raw data and organizing it into information. This enables top management to see things differently and farther into the future, so that they can make better decisions.

 
Many years ago, W. Edwards Deming did the same thing: he took raw data used in Statistical Process Control (SPC), and organized and simplified it into pictures so that people could determine root causes for process non-conformance. It revolutionized the entire Quality Assurance world and has made a huge positive impact on industry.

In a somewhat similar way, Executive S&OP today is giving people far better visibility:

  • It organizes data and synthesizes it into information.
  • It displays that information in a manner most suitable for top management decision making - largely via graphs not tabular spreadsheets.
  • This is coupled with defined and disciplined processes through which better decisions get made.

Having a spreadsheet without coupling it to a top management decision-making process does not qualify as Executive S&OP. Learning about this process is necessary but not sufficient; a company must use it at the executive level. When this happens, enormous benefits can result.




The S&OP Benchmarking Consortium 

 

Recently I spent two days at a very interesting session: a meeting of the S&OP Benchmarking Consortium at Penn State University.

Actually the meeting wasn't held at Penn State but rather was hosted, most graciously, by Kraft Foods in New Jersey. They handed out many samples of their products, including Planter's Peanuts, Oreos, and Balance Bars. Yummy.

Also attending the session were people from companies in consumer packaged goods, spirits, chemicals, lubricants, pharmaceuticals, and building materials.

We heard two fine presentations from Kraft Foods and S.C. Johnson. Following that, I briefed the group on what Bob and I see as the state of the art for Executive S&OP and also its future outlook. I couldn't stick around for the next day, which was devoted to working on the "S&OP Best Practices Survey," which is certainly an important activity; we need to know a lot more about what companies are doing with this powerful process.

This is a very good group, ably led by Professor Doug Thomas from Penn State.  It may be beneficial to your company.  To learn more about it, check our related websites page at  www.tfwallace.com.

Exploring the "Great Divide"
 
For years I've been intrigued by gap between the commercial side of the house - Sales and Marketing - and the operations group: Supply Chain, Manufacturing, Purchasing and so on.

A logical theory is that the greater the gap - the larger degree of disconnect between those two groups -  then the poorer will be the company's performance. Make sense? Does to us.

Well, now someone is trying to get a handle on this, not anecdotal but instead rigorous and fact-based. Dr. Simon Croom and Pat Lupica of the University of San Diego have a research project underway evaluating this disconnect and its effects.

Preliminary results are in and guess what? Companies using S&OP are reporting far better communications and teamwork than those not. This of course is no surprise, but it's good the see our feelings confirmed.

The survey is continuing and it's not too late to participate. To do so, click on:   www.zoomerang.com
 
Participants will receive a copy of the final report of the survey. We hope you do this; the more companies that participate, the better the survey, and the more knowledge we all have on how to use Executive S&OP even more effectively.  


 

©2006 T. F. Wallace & Company
5450 Windridge Court, PO Box 43576, Cincinnati, OH 45243      Phone: (513) 281-0500
www.tfwallace.com         info@tfwallace.com
 


NetCrafters brand