House and Senate Approve Continuing Resolution to
Fund Federal Programs through November 17th
Congress has approved a seven-week continuing resolution (CR) that
will continue to fund programs whose spending bills they have not yet approved, including the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education (LHHS)
spending bill that funds alcohol and drug prevention, treatment, education and research programs. The CR is necessary since the
2006 fiscal year is set to end on September 30th and funds for federal programs receiving discretionary monies will come to an
end. The CR was passed as a part of the Department of Defense appropriations package that was approved by the full House on
September 26th and the Senate on September 29th.
Under the continuing resolution, federal programs will be funded at
fiscal year 2006 levels through November 17th. Both houses of Congress are scheduled to recess on September
29th and are due to return from the mid-term election recess during the week of November 13th for a lame-duck
session. Leadership in both chambers have expressed their intention to schedule work on the remaining appropriations bills during
the November session. The House Appropriations Committee approved a LHHS spending bill in June and the Senate Appropriations
Committee approved its bill in July. Additional information, including the text and status of the LHHS funding bills, can be found
at: http://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app07.html.
Bill to Reauthorize Ryan White CARE Act Approved by the Full House;
Senate Could Vote on Legislation Before Congress Recesses; Legislation Would Make a Number of Significant Changes to Current Law
On September
28th, the full House approved legislation to reauthorize the Ryan White CARE Act (RWCA) for the next five years. The
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006 would provide federal funding for health care and supportive services to people living with
HIV/AIDS. The House voted to approve the legislation, H.R. 6143, by a 325 to 98 vote. Although the RWCA expired
in October of 2005, the program has continued to receive funding.
In the Senate,
sponsors of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act had attempted to schedule a vote on the legislation this week, but were unable to do
so after a hold was placed on the legislation. A small group of Senators, including Senators Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Barbara Boxer
(D-CA), and Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), expressed concern that the bill’s proposed changes to the Ryan White program would result in extreme
funding cuts to their states. However, Senator Michael Enzi (R-WY), chief sponsor of the Ryan White reauthorization legislation,
was expected to call for a procedural vote on Friday, September 29th to cut off debate on the bill and bring the measure to a
vote.
The Ryan White HIV/AIDS
Treatment Modernization Act of 2006 would require that seventy-five percent of Title I, II and III CARE Act funds for cities, states and primary
health care providers be spent on “core medical services.” Under the legislation, core medical services are defined
as including: substance abuse outpatient care, mental health services, home- and community-based health services, medical case management including
treatment adherence services, AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) treatments, outpatient and ambulatory health services, and AIDS pharmaceutical
assistance. Residential substance abuse services were not covered in this list of core medical services. Early intervention
services are included in the list of core medical services and may be provided in substance abuse and mental health treatment programs,
detoxification centers, public health departments, emergency rooms, detention facilities, clinics regarding sexually transmitted diseases, homeless
shelters, HIV/AIDS counseling and testing sites.
The remaining
twenty-five percent of funds for Titles I, II and III could be spent on supportive services; among the supportive services listed in H.R. 6143 are
outreach services, respite care, medical transportation, and referrals for health care and supportive services. While the
legislation includes a list of supportive services that can be covered, additional services not specified can also be eligible. In
addition, the legislation does contain a provision allowing grantees to obtain a waiver of this core medical services funding requirement from the
Secretary of Health and Human Services if it can be shown that core medical services are available to all individuals with HIV/AIDS in their service
area and that there is not a waiting list for ADAP services. Title IV funding for programs serving women and children with
HIV/AIDS would not be subject to the core medical services/support services funding distinction.
H.R. 6143 would
also:
- Expand the
definition of Title I metropolitan areas so that smaller cities could be eligible and change the Title II funding formula to states
- Authorize
funds for the Minority AIDS Initiative which seeks to evaluate and address the disproportionate impact of HIV disease and disparities in access,
treatment, care, and outcome on racial and ethnic minorities; funds would be authorized for the 2007 through 2010 fiscal years, with $131.5 million
authorized for the 2007 fiscal year and $135.1 for the 2008 fiscal year
- Require the
Secretary of Health and Human Services to develop and maintain a list of “core” ADAP antiretroviral medications developed by the
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services that are to be the minimum required treatments
- Change the
funding formulas so that people with HIV are counted in addition to people living with AIDS
Status and text of H.R.
6143 and S. 2823, the Senate version of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006, can be found at: http://thomas.loc.gov/.
Legislation Aimed at Helping Children Affected by Methamphetamine and
Other Drugs Approved by Both the House and the Senate; President Expected to Sign the Bill Into Law
On September
20th, the Senate approved S. 3525, the “Child and Family Services Improvement Act of 2006.” The House
approved identical legislation on September 26th. S. 3525 would reauthorize the Safe and
Stable Families program within the Department of Health and Human Services, and would reserve additional funding aimed at increasing the well-being
of, and improving the permanency outcomes for, children affected by methamphetamine or other drugs.
S. 3525 would
authorize a grant program through the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Safe and Stable Families program; funds could be used for
family-based comprehensive long-term addiction treatment services, early intervention and preventative services, children and family counseling,
mental health services, and parenting skills training. Two or more of the following entities working together would be eligible to
receive grant funds: state agencies responsible for administering the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment (SAPT) block grant program, child
welfare service providers, community providers of health or mental health services, law enforcement agencies, courts, juvenile justice officials,
schools, tribal child welfare agencies, and state child welfare agencies.
In the application
process, regional partnerships seeking grant funds would be required to include:
- Recent
evidence that use of methamphetamine or other drugs has had a substantial impact on the number of out-of-home placements for children, or the number
of children who are at risk of being placed in an out-of-home placement in the region;
- A list of
goals and outcomes to be achieved during the funding period;
- A
description of the strategies for collaborating with child welfare agencies and for consulting with the State agencies charged with administering the
SAPT block grant.
S. 3525 requires the
Secretary of Health and Human Services to reserve a total of $145 million for fiscal years 2007 through 2011 for these grants. In
reviewing grant applicants, the Secretary would be required to take into consideration the extent to which the applicants:
- demonstrate
that methamphetamine or other drug use by parents or caretakers has had a substantial impact on the number of out-of-home placements for children, or
the number of children who are at risk of being placed in an out-of-home placement, in the partnership region,
- have limited
resources for addressing the needs of children affected by such drug use and addiction,
- have a lack of
capacity for, or access to, comprehensive family treatment services.
Priority would be given
to applicants that propose to address methamphetamine use and addiction in the region, alone or in combination with other drug use and addiction, and
show that methamphetamine use and addiction is adversely affecting child welfare in the partnership region.
Additional information
about S. 3525 can be found at: http://thomas.loc.gov/.
Bill Introduced in House Would Establish a Criminal Drug Dealer Registry
and Notification Program
Congressman Steve
Pearce (R-NM) recently introduced H.R. 6155, the “Communities Leading Everyone Away From Narcotics through Online Warning Notification
Act,” or the “CLEAN TOWN” Act in the House of Representatives. In general, the bill would require the
establishment of jurisdiction-wide criminal drug dealer registries and penalize jurisdictions that fail to comply by withholding a percentage of the
federal crime control funds they receive through the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act. The bill provides limited
authority to exempt certain convicted individuals from the registry, includes provisions that would limit the amount of information made available to
the public, and provides for alternative compliance procedures where the law would violate the jurisdiction’s constitution.
The registries would contain a range of information about the individual who committed the offense, and the length of registration would
depend on the number of drug-related convictions the individual has acquired. In addition, H.R. 6155 would require the Attorney
General to establish a national criminal drug dealer registry and notification program.
Registry
Requirements
Under H.R. 6155,
the convicted individuals would have to register where they reside, where they are employed, and where they are a student; they would be required to
register before they complete their sentence and would also be responsible for renewing their registration on a yearly basis. An
individual would be required to provide his/her social security number, home address, place of employment and school, as well as license plate number
and vehicle description.
The registries
established by the bill would include a physical description of the individual; an explanation of the offense the person committed for which they are
required to register; the criminal history of the person, including the date of all arrests and convictions and the status of their parole, probation,
or supervised release; a current photograph; a set of fingerprints and palm prints; a photocopy of valid driver’s license or identification
card, and any other information required by the Attorney General.
An individual would be
required to register if they fall under the definition of a criminal drug dealer, defined as an individual who is convicted of any criminal offense
for manufacturing, distributing, dispensing, or possessing with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance as defined
by the Federal Controlled Substances Act.
Optional and
Mandatory Exemptions
The bill would
allow a jurisdiction to exempt individuals from the registration requirements for their first conviction in exchange for their substantial assistance
in the investigation or prosecution of another person who has committed an offense. Although the bill provides that jurisdictions
should make the registry information available to the public through an internet website, they must exempt the individual’s social security
number, arrests that did not lead to conviction, and any other information that the Attorney General wants to exempt. Additional
optional exemptions include information about other convictions not related to the offense for which registration is required, and the name of the
individual’s employer and school.
Duration of
Registration Requirement
Individuals would be
required to keep their registration information current for the full registration period beginning on the date of whichever of the following is most
recent: the date of conviction, the date on which they are released from prison, or the date on which they are placed on parole, supervised release,
or probation. The length of time that a person would be required to be on the register would depend on the number of
convictions. An individual who has been convicted of a criminal drug dealing offense for the first time would be required to be
registered for five years; a second conviction would result in a requirement of registration for ten years; and if a person is convicted more than
twice for a criminal drug dealing offense they would have to be registered for the life.
The bill was referred to
the House Judiciary Committee and has no co-sponsors. To view the complete text of the bill, visit http://www.thomas.loc.gov/.